"I am convinced that the Primitives are correct to make this distinction between eternal and temporal salvation and this is one of the main reasons that I am happy to be a Primitive Baptist today. Take away this hallmark of Old Baptist doctrine, and the Primitives are no different theologically than any other group."
More info:This article taken from ...
by Elder Michael L. Gowens
Today after more than three decades of trying to preach the gospel, I want
everyone to know that I deem it a priviledge to be identified with the Primitive Baptists.
Sadly, I haven't always been able to say that. Like a teenager with an "identity crisis", there was once a time that my attitude toward the people with whom I had been identified from childhood was dangerously negative and critical. Driven largely by personal ambitiion and an excessive concern with what people thought of me, I flirted with the notion of greener pastures.
The departure of a few close friends in the ministry in the late 80's and 90's, however, was a "wake-up call" to me. I discovered three important factors:
(1) That every group has its share of negatives;
(2) That the positives of the Primitive Baptists far exceed the negatives;
(3) That the positives of the Primitive Baptists, on an aggregate level, cannot be found among any other group.
Allow me to enumerate some of the positives. The following characteristics are (in my estimation) the non-negotiables-the key emphases that distinguish, when taken as a whole, the Old Baptists from other schools of thought. These are the reasons I am a Primitive Baptist today.
First, I share the Primitive Baptist's strong commitment to Biblical simplicity. Unlike most professing Christians, the Old Baptists believe that simplicity is perferable to complexity. We want to minimize distractions-whether in terms of physical decoration and adornment, or in terms of liturgical formality and extracurricular programs-from the central theme of Jesus Christ and Him crucified. I prefer the simple worship-structure of congregational singing, public prayer, and Biblical preaching observed by the typical Old Baptist Church.
I don't want to have to sort through a complex maze of religious activity in order to find one morsel of bread for my hungry soul. I like the solid theology and rich experience expressed in the old hymns and sung acapella by and entire congregation in four-part-harmony better than the low-cal, feel-good, musical performances, bands, and praise-choruses that are becoming increasingly more commonplace in many Christian circles today.
I had rather hear a Spirit-filled, extemporaneous sermon that explains the Bible, proclaims the good news with enthusiasm and passion, stirs my mind on the most sublime and noble themes, and confronts and challenges me to greater godliness, even though the preacher tends to end his sentences with a preposition or leave a participle dangling, instead of a refined and polished twenty-minute, four-point, prepackaged lesson that is mechanical and Spiritless. I get taht kind of simplicity among the Old Baptists, and I readily confess that is suits my case.
Second, I am a Primitive Baptist because I agree with the way they interpret scripture. No one makes sense of the whole Bible like the Primitive Baptists. No other group interprets Scripture with greater consistency than these people who understand the discipline of "rightly dividing the word of Truth."
The habit of distinguishing between sonship and discipleship - between unconditional and gospel salvation - between relationship and fellowship - between union with Christ and communion with Him - between regeneration and conversion - between eternity and time - between judicial and parental judgement - between the objective fact and the subjective experience - between reality and the perception of reality - is the hallmark that separates Primitive Baptists from virtually every other school of Biblical interpretation.
The doctrine embraced by sound Primitive Baptists makes room for both the "shalls" of Isaiah 1:18 and the "ifs" of Isaiah 1:19, affirming that eternal life is certain and guaranteed by God, while insisting that the life of Christian discipleship is conditioned largely on our obedience and faithfulness.
Old Baptists are virtually alone in their ability to reconcile apparently contradictory texts like Ephesians 2:8 (a text that teaches that salvation is not of ourselves) and Acts 2:40 (a text that exhorts us to save ourselves from this untoward generation), because they understand that the first verse has eternal ramifications and that the second does not.
I've never heard any preacher make sense of the Bible better than the average Primitive Baptist who understands the need to rightly divide the word of truth. I've never heard anyone but an Old Baptist explain how it could be that Christ died for "many" (Rom 8:29; Heb 9:28) who will ultimately live with Him in heaven, but that only "few" are traveling the narrow path of Christian discipleship (Mt 7:13-14).
I am convinced that the Primitives are correct to make this distinction between eternal and temporal salvation and this is one of the main reasons that I am happy to be a Primitive Baptist today. Take away this hallmark of Old Baptist doctrine, and the Primitives are no different theologically than any other group.
Third, I believe that the Old Baptist's interest in cultivating true, apostolic, New Testament churches is legitimate. Many in the current Christian climate of ecumenism reject the idea of church identity. But throughout history, there have always been those who sought to pursue a pure church, free from institutionalism.
Historians term people with these convictions "the Free Church Movement", a category that includes such relatively obscure groups as the Donatists, Novatians, Waldenses, Lollards, and more. Each of these groups maintained an identity exclusive of Catholicism. Each practiced believer's baptism and valued Holy Scripture as the sole rule of faith and life.
Though each had its flaws and blemishes, they shared one important thing in common-a commitment to apostilic purity in the face of ecclesiastical authoritarianism. They are often dismissed as heretics because only the works of those who wrote against them have survived. But each of these groups sought to tailor church worship, polity, faith and life to the Biblical and apostolic pattern, and to keep the church free of magisterial entanglements. They believed that God would continue to bless His true church and they sought to be identified as such a church by conforming themselves to the Biblical pattern.
The Primitive Baptists share this commitment to purity-in doctrine, practice, and the ethical conduct of their members- with a view to pleasing the Lord. In a day when many (if not most) denominations are "measuring themselves" by each other, competing with each other for popularity, and governing church life by popular fads and preferences, the Old Baptist concern to please God, to have authentic and true churches, and to be thoroughly Biblical is refreshing to me. That's an important reason that I am a Primitive Baptist today.
Further reasons could be cited, but i trust these will suffice. Perhaps I could find one or two of these features among another group of people, but I've never yet found anyone besides the Old Baptists where all three of these critical components are present. I know the Old Baptists are not perfect; but then, neither am I.
The faults of those of us known as Primitive Baptists notwithstanding, I am more committed today than ever before to be nothing more than a simple, old-time, Bible believing, salvation-by-grace-preaching, Primitive Baptist, even if others think I'm weird or ignorant or out-of-touch with the modern world. I concur with Primitive Baptist convictions regarding believer's baptism, close communion, age-integrated worship, and the need to maintain church discipline.
I am satisfied with the arguments against musical instruments in the worship service, Sunday Schools, mission boards, secret societies, and parachurch auxiliaries. I agree with their views of congregational church government and the role of women in the church. I am convinced that the Old Baptists are correct regarding the utility (or purpose) of the gospel and the conviction that God does not employ human means or instrumentality in regeneration.
I now know that this is where i fit. No longer do I struggle with an identity crisis. These are my people. They sing my song; they understand my story; they speak my language. I cannot speak for anyone else, but these are the reasons I am a Primitive Baptist.
The Old Baptists have been good to me since I united with them 37 years ago this month. I pray that The Lord would prevent me from ever doing anything to harm them.
I want to spend my days serving the Lord among them and seeking to promote their spiritual welfare.
Elder Michael L. Gowens